Risk factors and outcomes in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) is a cause of sensorineural hearing loss made by radiologic criteria. There is sparse literature involving audiological outcomes and cochlear implantation (CI) success in patients with CND. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with sensorineural hearing loss at a tertiary children's hospital from 2000 to 2020 was conducted. Patients with CND on radiographic imaging were included and categorized as hypoplastic, aplastic, or indeterminate. RESULTS: In this study, 53 patients were identified with CND, totaling 70 ears. Of the 53 patients, 30 (56.6 %) were male, 8 (16.0 %) had a family history of childhood hearing loss, 6 (11.3 %) were born preterm, and 11 (23.4 %) required neonatal intensive care admission. The median maternal age was 29 years old [IQR: 27, 35], and 8 (15 %) patients were born to mothers with diabetes. Of the 70 ears, 49 (70 %) utilized conventional hearing aids, 12 (17.1 %) utilized a bone-anchored hearing aid, and 10 (14.3 %) underwent CI. Of the 10 ears implanted, 4 (40 %) ears had nerves classified as hypoplastic, 3 (30 %) as aplastic, and 3 (30 %) as indeterminate. Improvement in pure tone averages compared to preoperative testing was demonstrated in 8 (80 %), and 6 (60 %) displayed improved speech awareness thresholds. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there may be an association between CND and maternal diabetes and NICU admission. There are variable results with hearing amplification options in patients with CND, and further research is needed to better describe the role of CI, bone-anchored hearing aids and conventional hearing aids in patients with CND.

A novel intraoperative continuous monitoring method combining dorsal cochlear nucleus action potentials monitoring with auditory nerve test system.

Highly accurate real-time cochlear nerve monitoring to preserve cochlear nerve function is essential for simultaneous cochlear implantation and ipsilateral vestibular schwannoma resection. In the present study, we developed a novel real-time monitoring system that combines dorsal cochlear nucleus action potential monitoring with intracochlear stimulating electrodes (Auditory Nerve Test System, ANTS). We used this system for a case with vestibular schwannoma resection via the translabyrinthine approach. The monitoring system developed in this study detected highly reliable evoked potentials from the cochlear nerve every two seconds continuously during tumor resection. Near-total tumor resection was achieved, and cochlear implantation was performed successfully after confirming the preservation of cochlear nerve function in a case. The patient's hearing was well compensated by cochlear implantation after surgery. Our novel method continuously achieved real-time monitoring of the cochlear nerve every two seconds during vestibular schwannoma resection. The usefulness of this monitoring system for simultaneous tumor resection and cochlear implantation was demonstrated in the present case. The system developed in this study is compatible with continuous facial nerve monitoring. This highly accurate and novel monitoring method will broaden the number of candidates for this type of surgery in the future.

Anatomical Features of Children With Mondini Dysplasia: Influence on Cochlear Implantation Performance.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the long-term auditory performance after cochlear implantation (CI) and identify anatomical features of Mondini dysplasia associated with post-CI outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. PATIENTS: We enrolled 49 ears with Mondini dysplasia who underwent CI with more than 7 years of follow-up and age at CI- and sex-matched control group with radiologically normal inner ears. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The development of auditory skills after CI was evaluated using word recognition scores (WRSs). The anatomical features were measured based on temporal bone computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, involving the width of the bony cochlear nerve canal (BCNC), cochlear basal turn, enlarged vestibular aqueduct, cochlear height, and diameter of the cochlear nerve (CN). RESULTS: CI in ears with Mondini dysplasia showed comparable benefits and improvement of auditory performance to controls during the 7 years of follow-up. In Mondini dysplasia, four (8.2%) ears showed narrow BCNC (<1.4 mm) with poorer WRS (58 ± 17%) than those with normal-sized BCNC, which had WRS (79 ± 10%) comparable to that of the control group (77 ± 14%). In Mondini dysplasia, the maximum ( r = 0.513, p < 0.001) and minimum ( r = 0.328, p = 0.021) CN diameters had positive correlations with post-CI WRS. The maximum CN diameter ( ß = 48.347, p < 0.001) and BCNC width ( ß = 12.411, p = 0.041) were significant factors that influence the post-CI WRS in multiple regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anatomical evaluation, especially BCNC status and CN integrity, may serve as predictive markers for post-CI performance.

Using a Facial Nerve Stimulator to Record the Auditory Nerve Compound Action Potential to Locate the Auditory Nerve During Vestibular Schwannoma Resection.

BACKGROUND: Improved technology in vestibular neuroma resection and facial nerve protection has become more sophisticated, and the protection of hearing during vestibular schwannoma resection is crucial. Currently, brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP), cochlear electrography, and cochlear nerve compound action potential (CNAP) are frequently used. The CNAP waveform is stable; however, the recording electrode can easily affect the procedure and cannot map the auditory nerve. The purpose of the study was to explore a simple method to record the CNAP and map the auditory nerve. METHODS: In this study, CNAP was recorded using a facial nerve bipolar stimulator to localize and protect the auditory nerve. The BAEP click stimulation mode was used. A bipolar stimulator was used as the recording electrode to record CNAP and locate anatomical displacement of the auditory nerve. The CNAP of 40 patients was monitored. Pure tone audiometry, speech discrimination score, and auditory evoked potential (BAEP) evaluations were performed on all patients before and after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, 30 patients obtained CNAP during surgery, and the rate of CNAP obtained was significantly higher than that of BAEP. The sensitivity and specificity of decrease in CNAP in predicting significant hearing loss were 88.9% and 66.7%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the disappearance of CNAP in predicting significant hearing loss were 52.9% and 92.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The bipolar facial nerve stimulator can locate and protect the auditory nerve by recording a stable potential. The CNAP obtained rate was significantly higher than that of BAEP. The disappearance of BAEP during acoustic neuroma monitoring can be used as a standard alert for the surgeon, and decrease in CNAP is an alert for the operator.

Prevalence of Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Hearing Device Use in Children With Single-Sided Deafness.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) in a cohort of pediatric patients with single-sided deafness (SSD). A secondary objective was to investigate trends in intervention and hearing device use in these children. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with chart review. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary care center. METHODS: Children ages 0 to 21 years with SSD (N = 190) who underwent computerized tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Diagnostic criteria for SSD included unilateral severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss with normal hearing sensitivity in the contralateral ear. Diagnostic criteria for CND included neuroradiologist report of an "aplastic or hypoplastic nerve" on MRI or a "stenotic cochlear aperture" on CT. RESULTS: The prevalence of CND was 42% for children with CT only, 76% for children with MRI only, and 63% for children with both MRI and CT. Of the children with MRI and CT, there was a 90% concordance across imaging modalities. About 36% of children with SSD had hearing devices that routed sound to the normal hearing ear (ie, bone conduction hearing device/contralateral routing of signal), while only 3% received a cochlear implant. Approximately 40% did not have a hearing device. Hearing device wear time averaged 2.9 hours per day and did not differ based on cochlear nerve status. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of CND in children with SSD. Cochlear nerve status should be confirmed via MRI in children with SSD. The limited implementation and use of hearing devices observed for children with SSD reinforce the need for increased support for early and continuous intervention.

Functional Outcome After Simultaneous Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Cochlear Implantation With Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry has emerged as a suitable option to intraoperatively assess cochlear nerve function during vestibular schwannoma resection. This study aimed to analyze the functional outcome and implant usage of patients with preserved auditory nerve responses after simultaneous translabyrinthine schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Patients with unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine tumor resection. Intraoperatively, electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry was performed before and after tumor removal. Cochlear implantation was carried out if positive responses were detected after tumor removal indicating cochlear nerve function. Postoperatively, patients were biannually followed-up to assess aided sound field audiometry and word recognition as well as implant usage. RESULTS: Overall, 26 patients with vestibular schwannoma underwent translabyrinthine schwannoma resection. Out of these patients, 15 had positive cochlear nerve responses after tumor removal and concurrently received a cochlear implant. In 13 patients with histologically confirmed vestibular schwannoma, hearing improved by 23.7 ± 33.2 decibels and word recognition by 25.0 ± 42.4% over a mean follow-up period of 18 months. Overall, 12 included patients were regular cochlear implant users. CONCLUSION: Patients with vestibular schwannoma can benefit substantially from cochlear implantation. Intraoperative assessment of cochlear nerve function using electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry can help to better identify individuals eligible for simultaneous vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation.

Noonan syndrome: cochlear implantation in the setting of cochlear nerve deficiency.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Noonan syndrome (NS) is a congenital disorder characterized by a wide heterogeneity in clinical and genetic features. Hearing loss can frequently occur in NS, although not always mentioned in its diagnostic criteria. We are reporting on a child with an established NS who underwent bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in the setting of cochlear nerve deficiency. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a child-girl affected by NS. Newborn hearing screening and audiological evaluations reveled an asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), profound at left ear and severe at right ear. Hearing aids were fitted at the age of six months. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed hypoplastic cochlear nerves. Due to progressive worsening of the hearing thresholds and inappropriate speech development, at the age of 2 years she underwent a left-sided cochlear implantation. Four years later, right ear was also implanted. Six years after the first surgery, a partial extrusion of the electrode array was noticed. Explantation and reimplantation of a new device was performed, adopting a subtotal petrosectomy approach. The patient reached a score of 95% in open-set speech perception tests. CONCLUSIONS: Hearing loss is a frequent finding in patients with NS; however, its nature and severity are very heterogenous. In consideration of the possible progression of SNHL, audiological follow-up in NS patients must be carefully and periodically performed so as to early detect worsening of hearing threshold. If indicated, cochlear implantation should be considered, taking account of audiological and systemic features of this syndrome.

Cochlear Implantation in a Patient with Neurofibromatosis Type 2 and an Intracochlear Schwannoma: A Case Report and Literature Review.

A primary intracochlear schwannoma (ICS) is a unique type of vestibular schwannoma (VS); the tumor originates from the terminal branches of the cochlear nerve and is confined to the cochlea. An ICS is the most common subtype of schwannoma in the inner ear. As an ICS is clinically rare, diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. We report a rare case of cochlear implantation (CI) in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 2 and an ICS. The patient exhibited bilateral, profound, sensorineural hearing loss. The tumor on one side was a common VS treated via tumor and acoustic nerve resection and that on the other side an ICS. To ensure auditory rehabilitation via CI, we performed CI while removing part of the ICS via an enlarged round window. Auditory rehabilitation was satisfactory. Thus, ICS patients, especially those who urgently require auditory rehabilitation, can undergo simultaneous CI and (total or partial) tumor removal. However, the long-term results require close observation.

Neural recovery function of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant surgery: Comparison between different regions of the cochlea.

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants allow measures of neural function, through Neural response telemetry (NRT) and Auditory nerve recovery function (REC). These help in programming the speech processor and understanding the auditory system. However, not many studies have evaluated and compared these in different regions of the cochlea. OBJECTIVE: Comparing NRT and REC in different regions of the cochlea. METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive and prospective. NRT and REC (through the function of T0 - absolute refractory period, A - amplitude and TAU - time constant of the relative refractory period parameters) were evaluated, in three groups according to the stimulated electrode of the cochlea: apical, medial and basal. RESULTS: 26 adult patients were evaluated, 2 bilateral, totalling 28 ears. Data analysis showed no statistically significant difference between NRT between medial and basal but showed between apical and medial and apical and basal. For T0, there was a significant difference between medial and basal; for A, there was a significant difference between apical and basal and also medial and basal; and for TAU, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in NRT and REC when compared between different regions of the cochlea.

[Cochlear nerve continuity preservation during retrosigmoid ablative osteotomy of the internal auditory canal for advanced vestibular schwannomas]. / Kontinuitätserhalt des Nervus cochlearis bei der retrosigmoidalen ablativen Osteotomie des inneren Gehörgangs bei fortgeschrittenen Vestibularisschwannomen.

The data of 86 patients with retrosigmoid microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma in tumor stage Koos II-IV were evaluated. In more than two thirds of the cases it was shown that the cochlear nerve followed the facial nerve, which is easily identified by electroneurography, in recurrent similar patterns in the region of the internal auditory canal. Starting from the fundus, this facilitated early identification and thus preservation of continuity of the cochlear nerve in the course of the internal auditory canal. This was of particular importance when safe functional preservation could not be guaranteed due to tumor size or formation despite intraoperative derivation of somatosenoric potentials, but when the possibility of subsequent hearing rehabilitation with a cochlear implant should be granted. Preoperative MRI sequences gave an indication of the possible nerve courses in some cases, but intraoperative imaging in the internal auditory canal was superior to MRI.

Cochlear implantation versus auditory brainstem implantation in children with auditory nerve deficiencies.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear nerve deficiency is one of the known causes of congenital sensorineural hearing loss. Management of hearing loss in children with cochlear nerve deficiency poses a multidimensional challenge. The absent or hypoplastic cochlear nerve may prevent electrical stimulation from reaching the brainstem and the auditory cortex. A deficient cochlear nerve can be associated with other inner ear malformations, which may diminish the success of cochlear implantation in those children. Promising results in adults after auditory brainstem implantation led to the expansion of candidacy to include the pediatric populations who were contraindicated for CIs. OBJECTIVE: To review the outcomes of cochlear implantation versus that of auditory brainstem implantation in children with various conditions of the auditory nerve. METHODS: This retrospective chart review study comprised two pediatric groups. The first group consisted of seven ABI recipients with cochlear nerve aplasia and the second group consisted of another seven children with cochlear nerve deficiencies who underwent CI surgery. The participants' auditory skills and speech outcomes were assessed using different tests selected from the Evaluation of Auditory Responses to Speech (EARS) test battery. RESULTS: There were some individual variations in outcomes depending on the status of the auditory nerve. The mean CAP score of the ABI group was 2.87, while the mean SIR score was 0.62. On the other hand, the mean CAP score of the CI group was 1.29, while the mean SIR score was 0.42. CONCLUSION: Our results are in good agreement with the reported auditory perception and speech and language development outcomes of pediatric auditory brainstem implantation. We added to the growing body of literature on the importance of verifying and identifying the status of the cochlear nerve in the decision-making process of the surgical management of those pediatric groups.

Intraoperative Cochlear Nerve Monitoring for Vestibular Schwannoma Resection and Simultaneous Cochlear Implantation in Neurofibromatosis Type 2: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) often results in profound hearing loss and cochlear implantation is an emerging hearing rehabilitation option. However, cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in this population vary, and intraoperative monitoring to predict cochlear nerve viability and subsequent outcomes is not well-established. OBJECTIVE: To review the use of intraoperative electrically evoked cochlear nerve monitoring in patients with NF2 simultaneous translabyrinthine (TL) vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection and cochlear implantation. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 3 patients with NF2 that underwent simultaneous TL VS resection and cochlear implantation with electrical auditory brainstem response (eABR) measured throughout tumor resection. Patient demographics, preoperative assessments, surgical procedures, and outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: Patients 1 and 3 had a reliable eABR throughout tumor removal. Patient 2 had eABR pretumor removal, but post-tumor removal eABR presence could not be reliably determined because of electrical artifact interference. All patients achieved auditory percepts upon CI activation. Patients 1 and 2 experienced a decline in CI performance after 1 yr and after 3 mo, respectively. Patient 3 continues to perform well at 9 mo. Patients 2 and 3 are daily users of their CI. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is attainable in cases of NF2-associated VS resection. Intraoperative eABR may facilitate cochlear nerve preservation during tumor removal, though more data and long-term outcomes are needed to refine eABR methodology and predictive value for this population.

Simultaneous Nonmastoidectomy Infrapromontorial Tumor Removal and Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma Patient.

INTRODUCTION: Restoration of hearing in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) and poor hearing poses a great challenge. Simultaneous cochlear implantation during surgery for VS removal offers favorable hearing outcome if the cochlear nerve remains intact. Recent refinement of surgical techniques using the endoscope has made it possible to simultaneously restore the hearing and remove the tumor. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 62-year-old male had left severe sensorineural hearing loss and a 4 mm intracanalicular VS. We performed simultaneous nonmastoidectomy infrapromontorial VS removal and cochlear implantation in this patient to achieve minimal invasiveness and to provide maximal hearing restoration. The tumor was removed via this corridor while maintaining the integrity of cochlear as well as facial nerves with full insertion of a medium length cochlear implant electrode. After surgery, the patient showed good hearing rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous infrapromontorial VS removal and nonmastoidectomy cochlear implantation serves as an option for hearing restoration with minimal invasiveness in small VS removal.

Detailed insight into transtympanic electrocochleography (TT-ECochG) and direct cochlear nerve action potential (CNAP) for intraoperative hearing monitoring in patients with vestibular schwannoma - methodology of measurements and interpretation of results.

<b>Background:</b> The aim was to present the methodology and interpretation of intraoperative hearing monitoring with simultaneous Transtympanic Electrocochleography (TT-ECochG) and direct Cochlear Nerve Action Potential (CNAP) measurements during vestibular schwannoma removal. <br><b>Materials and Methods:</b> Detailed methodology of measurements and interpretation of results are presented in three exemplary patients who underwent tumor removal via middle fossa approach (MFA) with the use of intraoperative monitoring of hearing with TT-ECochG and direct CNAP performed in real time. In addition, all responses were automatically recorded and stored along with surgical information and subjected to detailed analyses and calculation after surgery. <br><b>Results:</b> The following changes in TT-ECochG and direct CNAP responses were observed: Patient #1 - TT-ECochG and CNAP responses with minor, but transient, morphology changes (hearing was preserved); Patient #2 - CNAP responses changed significantly but, temporarily, from triphasic into biphasic responses later, with marked but partially reversible desynchronization of CNAP; changes in TT-ECochG responses were also observed but, at the end, returned to baseline (surgery-related deterioration of hearing); Patient #3 - irreversible changes of TT-ECochG and direct CNAP (complete loss of hearing). <br><b>Conclusions:</b> A combination of TT-ECochG and direct CNAP allows for real-time monitoring of auditory function during vestibular schwannoma resection and surgical manipulation which contribute to the risk of hearing loss. Therefore, the surgeon can be instantly informed about changes which could increase the possibility of preserving the patient's hearing.

Bimodal stimulation in children with inner ear malformation: One side cochlear implant and contralateral auditory brainstem implant.

OBJECTIVE: To determine audiological outcomes of children who use a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) in the contralateral ear. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve children followed with CI and contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI) by Hacettepe University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology in Turkey. All children were diagnosed with different inner ear malformations with cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia. CI was planned in the ear with better sound detection during behavioural testing with inserted ear phones and with better CN as seen on MRI. Due to the limited auditory and speech progress with the cochlear implant, ABI was performed on the contralateral ear in all subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiological performance and auditory perception skills of children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) who use bimodal electrical stimulation with CI and contralateral ABI. RESULTS: Mean age of the subjects was 84.00 ± 33.94 months. Age at CI surgery and ABI surgery was 25.00 ± 10.98 months and 41.50 ± 16.14 months, respectively. However, hearing thresholds only with CI and only with ABI did not reveal significant difference, and auditory perception scores improved with bimodal stimulation. The MAIS scores were significantly improved from unilateral CI to bimodal stimulation (P = .002). Pattern perception and word recognition scores were significantly higher with the bimodal condition when compared to CI only and ABI only conditions. CONCLUSION: Children with CND showed better performance with CI and contralateral ABI combined. Depending on the audiological and radiological results, bimodal stimulation should be advised for children with CND.

Auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) in children without neurofibromatosis type II (NF2): communication performance and safety after 24 months of use.

Objectives: To assess the safety and communication performance of auditory brainstem implant (ABI) provision in children who were contraindicated for cochlear implantation and do not have neurofibromatosis type II (NF2).Methods: Communication performance was assessed via a battery of tests up to 24 months after first fitting. Safety was assessed intra-operatively and via post-operative adverse event reports.Results: Ten children participated in the study. The mean communication skills on all 8 tests for which inferential statistics were possible increased significantly from pre-operatively to 12 months and either again increased significantly or remained stable from 12 to 24 months. Communication development was variable: some children achieved high scores while others did not. Two serious adverse events that were device or procedure-related were reported and successfully resolved.Discussion: ABI provision in this population group was safe. Participants' auditory abilities were significantly better after 24 months of ABI use than at pre-implantation. Development was slower than that of children with a cochlear implant but may continue progressing after 24 months of use.Conclusion: ABI provision and use is safe and allows significant auditory development in children without NF2 who are contradicted for cochlear implantation.

Systematic review of cochlear implantation in CHARGE syndrome.

Objective: CHARGE syndrome presents with a collection of congenital anomalies affecting multiple organs. Ear and temporal bone anomalies, including hearing loss are highly prevalent. We present an aid to management of this challenging condition and report the strategies and outcomes of cochlear implantation. Methods: Systematic review of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov was performed up to 21/10/2018 The review and meta-analysis of studies were performed according to the PRISMA statement. Patient demographics, comorbidity, anatomical factors, details of cochlear implantation and audiological outcome were extracted and summarized. Anatomical and surgical factors were evaluated by meta-analysis. Audiological outcomes reported were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. All statistics were calculated with SPSS v23.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Results: Thirty-one studies reported 165 cochlear implants in 156 patients with CHARGE syndrome. Temporal bone and facial nerve anomalies were common. Discussion: The assessment and management of patients with CHARGE syndrome undergoing cochlear implantation is challenging. Outcomes may be affected by cochlear nerve deficiency, inner ear anomalies, and developmental delay. Surgery is almost invariably complicated by abnormal anatomy, and increased incidence of complications. Conclusion: A careful, case-by-case assessment of an individual's requirements within a multi-disciplinary setup is essential for achieving the best possible outcome.

Transposition of the Culprit Artery Passing Between the Facial Nerve and Auditory Nerve in Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm.

BACKGROUND: Decompression of the culprit artery causing hemifacial spasm (HFS), which passes between the facial nerve (cranial nerve [CN] VII) and the auditory nerve (CN VIII), can be difficult, especially if the artery compresses CN VII right after passing between the 2 nerves. Perforators or small arteries branching from near the compression site to adjacent structures can hinder the decompression process because such vessels can anchor the passing condition. The effect of such perforators or small arteries on the decompression process in such cases was investigated. METHODS: The culprit artery passed between any part of CN VII and VIII in 59 of 396 consecutive patients with HFS who underwent microvascular decompression. The culprit artery compressed CN VII right after passing between the 2 nerves in 22 of the 59 cases. Direction of the perforators or small arteries from near the compression site and direction of decompression of the culprit artery were analyzed in these 22 cases. RESULTS: Perforators or small arteries were observed in 20 cases, predominantly in the medial direction. The culprit artery was mobilized toward the petrous bone direction in most cases. No clear relationship was found between the 2 factors. CONCLUSIONS: Variation of curvature or tortuosity of the culprit artery and length of perforators or small branches may also have affected the decompression process and the directions. Adequate dissection near the compression site to obtain maximum mobilization of the culprit artery is necessary to achieve successful decompression in such cases.